Settlement Vs. Trial Verdicts: Which Is Right for Your Mesothelioma Case?


A mesothelioma diagnosis is overwhelming, and legal action adds to the challenge. Since asbestos exposure symptoms take decades to appear, victims often race against time for diagnosis and compensation. Patients must choose between a settlement or a trial when seeking legal recourse. Each option has its benefits and risks. Here are three key factors to consider.

1. Speed and Certainty: Settlements Offer Immediate Relief

The speed and certainty of settlements make them a superior choice for those seeking immediate relief. Time is the most valuable resource for mesothelioma patients. Settlements typically resolve faster than trials, which can last multiple months or even years. The legal process allows both parties to negotiate, and asbestos companies often opt for settlements to avoid expensive trial procedures and unfavorable publicity.

Patients secure payments that cover medical costs, alleviate financial strain, and support family care expenses by settling. Trials, on the other hand, come with uncertainty. Even strong legal cases carry risks during trials because jurors might deliver unpredictable judgments, or procedural rules may pose barriers. Patients with advanced illnesses gain immediate access to the funds they need through settlements, enabling them to focus on their health and quality of life.

2. Financial Compensation: Trials Can Yield Larger Awards

The certainty of settlement agreements often conflicts with the potential for substantially higher damages that trials may offer. While settlements guarantee outcomes, a trial can result in significant financial awards, especially when corporate negligence is egregious. Juries may award punitive and compensatory damages like medical costs, pain, and suffering. Through punitive damage awards, juries deter corporate conduct that displays reckless behavior to stop future occurrences of wrongdoing. For example, mesothelioma settlements have sometimes resulted in multi-million dollar compensation awards.

Trials are risky by nature. The plaintiff gets no reward when a jury supports the defendant, but some jurisdictions allow the plaintiff to file appeals. To secure a trial victory, a mesothelioma lawyer must present overwhelming evidence, professional expert opinions, and an engaging story to persuade jurors. Strong cases can encounter significant obstacles during legal proceedings, even when asbestos exposure and corporate misconduct are demonstrated.

Settlements avoid this gamble. While the payout in a settlement might be lower than what a jury could potentially award, it provides guaranteed compensation. Many bankrupt companies that created asbestos trust funds operate structured settlement systems, offering standardized compensation levels based on disease severity. For families needing immediate funds, the prompt availability of money from asbestos trust fund settlements is often preferred, even if it means accepting a smaller payment.

3. Control Over the Outcome: Privacy vs. Public Accountability

The private nature of settlements shields participants from public court examinations. The confidentiality of settlements attracts families who want to prevent medical and financial information from becoming public knowledge. The terms of settlements allow plaintiffs to establish payment structures and to avoid disclosure of certain information through non-disclosure agreements.

On the other hand, trials are public proceedings. This transparency holds asbestos companies accountable and exposes personal information to public records. For certain plaintiffs, the need to reveal negligent parties and seek extensive changes takes precedence over privacy protection. Final court rulings in mesothelioma cases act as binding legal decisions that establish precedents to protect more victims suffering from asbestos exposure.

Endnote

Every mesothelioma case is unique. Factors like the patient’s health, the strength of evidence, and the defendant’s willingness to negotiate all influence whether a settlement or trial is preferable. If time and certainty are priorities, a settlement may be ideal. If maximizing compensation or demanding public accountability matters most, a trial could be worth the risk. An experienced mesothelioma attorney can evaluate your case and explain realistic outcomes, no matter what route you choose.

Do You Need An Attorney?

If so, post a short summary of your legal needs to our site and let attorneys submit applications to fulfill those needs. No time wasted, no hassle, no confusion, no cost.

Posted - 02/11/2025